![]() ![]() In a comment on the study, two Georgia doctors who reviewed it before it was accepted for publication compared parents' sucking on their child's pacifier to mothers chewing food before feeding it to their infants, "a practice that is now only rarely observed in Westernized societies where processed and sterile infant food is available." Both practices, of course, involve the mother sharing saliva with the baby. But the kids whose parents sucked on their pacifiers were two-thirds less likely to develop eczema and nearly 90% less likely to develop asthma. You probably know where this is going: By the time they were a year-and-a-half old, a quarter of the children had developed eczema and 5% had developed asthma. Three-quarters of the children used a pacifier in their first year of life, and about half of their parents said they cleaned their kid's pacifier by sucking on it, as opposed to boiling it or rinsing it in tap water, the scientists reported in Pediatrics in 2013. A total of 184 children were followed up until they were 18 months, and all but 10 of them were followed until they turned 3 years old. In a related study, Swedish researchers focused on pacifiers, specifically, the relationship between how parents cleaned their infant's pacifier and the child's risk of developing eczema, a common rash-like skin condition whose most common type is an allergic reaction, or asthma, which is also associated with allergies. "The hygiene hypothesis remains controversial, however, as it is unable to fully explain many associations, including the rise of allergies in 'unhygienic' inner-city environments," Hancox and his coauthors note. But sticking dirty fingers in their mouth would expose children to more germs. As a result, Strachan theorized, rates of asthma and hay fever have climbed in wealthier societies. The hygiene hypothesis, first proposed by British epidemiologist David Strachan in 1989, suggests that children who grow up in extremely clean homes aren't exposed to germs that help strengthen their immune system. These findings add to evidence supporting the "hygiene hypothesis," the study authors write. The first two are linked to a higher risk of a positive test, the last one to a lower risk. You need to take the full course of antibiotics.The link between thumb-sucking or nail-biting and a lower risk of reacting to a skin-prick tests persisted even after the scientists accounted for confounding factors such as a parent who's had a positive skin-prick test, parental smoking and cat or dog ownership from birth to age 9. Do not stop taking them just because you feel better. If your doctor prescribed antibiotics, take them as directed.If you are not taking a prescription pain medicine, ask your doctor if you can take an over-the-counter medicine. ![]() If the doctor gave you a prescription medicine for pain, take it as prescribed.Your doctor will tell you when to return to have the stitches removed. If you have stitches, do not remove them on your own.Apply more petroleum jelly and replace the bandage as needed.You may cover the wound with a thin layer of petroleum jelly, such as Vaseline, and a non-stick bandage.If the bandage sticks to the wound, use warm water to loosen it. After the first 24 to 48 hours, you can remove the bandage and gently wash around the wound with clean water 2 times a day.If you did not get instructions, follow this general advice: If your doctor told you how to care for your wound, follow your doctor's instructions.Use a plastic bag to cover the area when you shower. Leave the bandage on, and if you have stitches, do not get them wet for the first 24 to 48 hours.Try to keep it above the level of your heart. If possible, prop up the injured area on a pillow anytime you sit or lie down during the next 3 days. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |